Kelly Case Study Essay

1. harmonize to Kelly, the or so superordinate hold within Philips establish of clergy would close to plausibly be that clergy members are get hold of representatives of God and that they carry out his will. coadjutor to this is the daily duties and sacrifices that clergy members must undertake, such as a vow of chastity and the apparitional guidance they must give to parishioners. come on subordinate to this stimulate is Philips scholarship that differences in faces exist amongst clergy members, such as those who advocate reform within the perform versus those who are more orthodox.2. The two near evident and contrasting poles of Philips clergy take could be the f answer that Philip sees the church as a guiding, divine and spiritual entity, versus his view that it can also be constraining and somewhat forbidding. This would apply to the dichotomy corollary, as it postulates that people use dichotomous poles of a construct to view the same impression in opposing (ac cording to the persons own personal viewpoint) ways.3. Philips clergy construct is the same as that of others in the smell that both he and other clergy members looking at the weight of their responsibilities and obligations to their followers. They can consequently utter with each other astir(predicate) these issues ascribable to the common experiences shared by the clergy members, and indeed this applies to the commonality corollary.4. Philips clergy construct is contrastive from that of others in the sense that he disagrees with the views of members of the clergy who give care to reform certain practices of the church. Philip believes that the traditional methodologies of the church should continue to be followed, and he sees it as somewhat irrational and unbecoming that reformers would suppress what they were taught and swore to carry out. These differences in construction of events and beliefs would most closely apply to the individuality corollary.5. According to Kell y, Philips clergy construct would most likely be considered fairly impermeable, collectible to his rampart to changes within the framework of how he envisions the church. This could be more commonly characterised as closed-minded or perhaps traditional, as Philips construct of the church does not permit a wide range of mountains of convenience and is therefore resistant to including advanced elements (in this case, reform ofchurch practices).6. The sociality corollary states that people, when playing a role in social situations, act in accordance with the expectations of others, and that the understanding of another(prenominal) persons outlook and expectations is cognize as a role construct. An example of this in the case culture could be the fact that Philip is aware when disquisition to certain members of the public that he evokes a change in their behaviour due to his position as a priest. They discover sure not to seem nauseating or blasphemous in some(prenominal) way , and Philip is aware that they are acting differently than they normally would. In this case, the people fastening their behaviour in Philips front end would be considered the role players, as they thrust a role construct about Philip due to his priesthood likely that he is very(prenominal) couth and averse to any descriptor of potentially offensive or roughhewn behaviour and consequently adjust their mannerisms accordingly.